Skip to content

Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.

Author(s): Sarah Hicks; Bonnie Duran; Nina Wallerstein; Magdalena Avila; Lorenda Belone; Julie Lucero; Maya Magarati; Elana Mainer; Diane Martin; Michael Muhammad; John Oetzel; Cynthia Pearson; Puneet Sahota; Vanessa Simonds; Andrew Sussman; Greg Tafoya; Emily White Hat

Publication: 2012. "Prog Community Health Partnersh" 6, 3 (Fall): 289-99.

Identifier(s): PubMed ID: 22982842; PMCID: PMC3586244; ISSN: 1557-0541; Citation Key: 7534

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0049

Publication type: Journal Article

Access: Google Scholar | Tagged | XML

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Since 2007, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center (PRC) has partnered with the Universities of New Mexico and Washington to study the science of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Our goal is to identify facilitators and barriers to effective community-academic partnerships in American Indian and other communities, which face health disparities.

OBJECTIVES: We have described herein the scientific design of our National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study (2009-2013) and lessons learned by having a strong community partner leading the research efforts.

METHODS: The research team is implementing a mixed-methods study involving a survey of principal investigators (PIs) and partners across the nation and in-depth case studies of CBPR projects.

RESULTS: We present preliminary findings on methods and measures for community-engaged research and eight lessons learned thus far regarding partnership evaluation, advisory councils, historical trust, research capacity development of community partner, advocacy, honoring each other, messaging, and funding.

CONCLUSIONS: Study methodologies and lessons learned can help community-academic research partnerships translate research in communities.